Bac à Sable
Bac à sable
Exemples
Explications
Type annuaire
Type agenda
Type ressourcerie
Type blog
Mise en page avancée
Aide
Vos pages
OldjH1
OldjH2
OldjH3
OldjH4
Frédéric
Franck Wehrlé
Julien Sanchez-Cortes
Olivier Chanut
Isabelle Cazaunau
Jonathan DUVIVIER
Marion Cassou
Julie Chabaud
Adeline Bourgeois
Julie Roturier
Sophie Humbert
Julie Dumont
Justine Bosredon
Susana Avila
Alexandra Minicki
Hélène Pauillac
Tiphaine Ardouin
Matthieu RAIMBAULT
Julie Blanquet
Pascal Bourgois
Anne Eugénie
Rechercher
×
Se connecter
×
Se connecter
Email ou NomWiki
Mot de passe
Mot de passe perdu ?
Se souvenir de moi
Se connecter
S'inscrire
Aide
Gestion du site
Tableau de bord
Base de données
Bac à Sable
Activer JavaScript pour joindre des fichiers.
Fichier
Annuler
Échoué
×
Télécharger le fichier
Texte du lien de téléchargement
Afficher le pdf dans la page :
sous forme de lien
directement inclus dans la page
Alignement de l'image
Texte en dessous
Gauche
Centre
Droite
Taille de l'image
Miniature (140x97)
Moyenne (300x209)
Large (780x544)
Taille originale
Texte affiché au survol
Paramètres avancés
Lien web associé au clic
Effets graphiques
Bord blanc
Ombre portée
Agrandissement au survol
Permettre de cliquer sur l'image pour l'afficher en grand
Oui
Non
Texte de remplacement
Sauver
Format
Titre 1
Titre 2
Titre 3
Titre 4
Centré
Texte agrandi
Texte mis en valeur
Code source en mode bloc
Code source en mode ligne
Rend visible la partie sélectionnée uniquement en mode édition
Activer JavaScript pour joindre des fichiers.
Fichier
Annuler
Échoué
Composants
Éditer le composant sélectionné
Boutons
Sommaire
Mise en forme
Section
Etiquette
Encadré
Syndication / Flux RSS
Gestion des tags
Actions d'envoi d'e-mail/listes
Vidéo intégrée
Réactions / Votes
Onglets
Afficher les données d'un formulaire
Afficher un formulaire de création de fiche
Actions avancées
Selenium is actually a widely-used automation testing framework your supports several programs languages, plus Java, C#, Ruby, Python, and JavaScript. It uses the WebDriver API to interact with browsers and simulate user actions. Selenium's flexibility allows testers to create custom test cases it complement their needs perfectly. Always, this supports assorted platforms, like as Windows, Linux, and macOS. Selenium try one ideal complement those who have to work with multiple programming languages or testing environments. it is also great for cross-browser testing, especially since that it aids most browsers. However, it requires slightly more setup than Puppeteer does, plus its documentation is difficult to navigate.Puppeteer is simpler to use and comes with a lot of features integral. One major benefit is it works just with Google Chrome, to help you make sure your testing matches issues distinct compared to that internet browser. Testing with Puppeteer is commonly faster too, given its easy-to-use functions plus the control it provides.Regardless of and tool one select, the most crucial factor is selecting the ideal approach to automated testing. Use a test automation framework, focus on high-impact areas with the best chances, and always integrate very early into your development cycle. With these types of considerations in mind, oftentimes Selenium or Puppeteer can help you achieve effective, accurate evaluating.In conclusion, choosing anywhere between Selenium and Puppeteer depends on ones specific requirements. If you're searching for a widely-used, cross-platform solution it aids numerous browsers, then Selenium is how you can go. But if you're more focused at efficiency, simplicity, and working with Chromium-based browsers, Puppeteer could become the greater choice for you. Ultimately, conducting the best comprehensive evaluation and testing both technology will help figure out which one is best for the needs. Puppeteer, regarding the some other hand, is a newer tool that had been manufactured by Google. It offers every one of the exact same benefits as Selenium, but with a couple of key differences. For the one, Puppeteer provides most control over headless browser testing, that may assistance improve efficiency and save time. It also include built-in attributes such as PDF generation, screenshot capture, and tracing. Concerning show, Puppeteer has a significant feature during Selenium in terms concerning rate and also memory usage. Because Puppeteer runs on Google's V8 JavaScript engine, which will be incredibly fast plus efficient, it could execute tasks faster than Selenium. And, Puppeteer has a smaller footprint as it doesn't need another web server in order to run. Choosing between Selenium plus Puppeteer finally depends on your needs and needs. If you’re comfortable with many different programming languages, need to testing many browsers, to want to collaborate easily and some other testers, Selenium may get your smartest choice. But if you are looking for an instrument that will help one create faster test results and do more at less code, Puppeteer is worth considering.in conclusion, both of the Selenium and Puppeteer have their strengths and weaknesses. Their choice between them depends on the nature of the undertaking and the particular demands to their testing process. Selenium is flexible, functions across numerous platforms, and also has considerable community support although Puppeteer is easy to use, excels in headless browsing, as well as delivers better performance. Ultimately, the decision will fall to weighing the good qualities and cons and deciding which meets your requirements about effectively. Another interest is performance. Puppeteer offers faster browsing rates as it works outdoors a browser, unlike Selenium. It besides allows direct access to Chrome DevTools protocol, enabling faster debugging sessions. Regardless these benefits, Puppeteer could be slower than Selenium when executing multiple work simultaneously. Selenium, however, uses multiple web browser instances, that do slow down their process. Are you regarding hunt for your reliable automation tool for your net application screening needs? You might become thinking which is better: Selenium or Puppeteer. Both are popular open-source tools that enable testers to speed up repetitive tasks, these as clicking buttons and also filling out forms. However, you can find key differences when considering them which you must know before picking out the one which suits assembling your project requirements. Selenium and Puppeteer are two concerning the most used automated screening tools of website applications. While simultaneously work well in their own personal ways, you will find immense differences between them. [[https://gologin.com/blog/automated-web-scraping-battle here]] In this specific article, we’ll explore when you should choose Selenium and when Puppeteer is the best option.Another distinction between the equipment is their support for parallel testing, where multiple tests run simultaneously, speeding up the test cycle. Selenium offers integration with several test frameworks, including TestNG and JUnit, that allow users to apply parallel execution. In contrast, Puppeteer doesn't yet have a built-in mechanism for parallel evaluating, but there tend to be workarounds available, such as using Jest or Mocha.
Mots clés
Sauver
Annuler
Thème
×
Choisissez un formulaire
Nb. : Il est possible d'afficher plusieurs bases de données d'un coup en entrant leur id séparé par une virgule [
accéder à la documentation
].
Code à inclure dans la page
×
Ajouter un lien au texte selectionné
Modifier le lien
Créer une page
Nom de la page ou URL externe
Nom de la page à créer
Le nom de la page ne doit pas contenir de caractères spéciaux autre que - ou _ . Les URL doivent commencer par https://
Si la page n'existe pas, elle sera créée.
Cette page existe déjà !
Texte affiché
Texte du lien vers cette page
Texte au survol
Le lien s'ouvre dans l'onglet courant
Le lien s'ouvre dans un nouvel onglet
Le lien s'ouvre dans une fenêtre modale
×
Télécharger le fichier
Texte du lien de téléchargement
Afficher le pdf dans la page :
sous forme de lien
directement inclus dans la page
Alignement de l'image
Texte en dessous
Gauche
Centre
Droite
Taille de l'image
Miniature (140x97)
Moyenne (300x209)
Large (780x544)
Taille originale
Texte affiché au survol
Paramètres avancés
Lien web associé au clic
Effets graphiques
Bord blanc
Ombre portée
Agrandissement au survol
Permettre de cliquer sur l'image pour l'afficher en grand
Oui
Non
Texte de remplacement
Protection anti-spam active
×
Apparence de la page here
Thème
margot
Squelette
1col
1col.vertical-menu
2cols-left
2cols-right
full-page
Style
margot-fun
margot
light
Preset
Preset par défaut
default
fun
landes
red
yellow
Image de fond
‹
›
Paramètres avancés
Langue de la page
Català
English
Español, castellano
Français
Nederlands, vlaams
Português
Choisir une page pour:
le menu horizontal
les raccourcis en haut à droite
l'entête (bandeau)
le pied de page
le menu vertical